Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Kimi K2.6

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Kimi K2.6 (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Haiku 5.5moonshotai logoKimi K2.6
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.1055$0.7913
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.5275$3.70
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$0.3693$2.64
Context window1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Release date10/7/20264/20/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image
Throughput (p50)—42 tokens/s (n=15)
Arena · overallUnranked#58 · ELO 1,461
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#41 · ELO 1,441
Arena · codingUnranked#43 · ELO 1,516

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-02; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.5275 per 1M output tokens, 86% less than Kimi K2.6.
  • For long documents, Claude Haiku 5.5: a 1,000,000-token context window against 262,144 for Kimi K2.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Haiku 5.5

There are **3** r's in "strawberry." 1. **Spell out the word:** s, t, r, a, w, b, e, r, r, y 2. **Go through each letter and count the r's:** - Position 3: **r** (count = 1) - Position 8: **r** (count = 2) - Position 9: **r** (count = 3) 3. **Check the rest:** s, t, a, w, b, e, and y are not r's. Total: **3**
2.4s200 output tokens

Kimi K2.6

Here is the step-by-step count: **Step 1:** Write out the word and number each letter. 1. s 2. t 3. **r** ← 1st 'r' 4. a 5. w 6. b 7. e 8. **r** ← 2nd 'r' 9. **r** ← 3rd 'r' 10. y **Step 2:** Identify the positions containing the letter 'r'. - The 3rd letter is **r** - The 8th letter is **r** - The 9th letter is **r** **Step 3:** Tally the total. There are **3** letter 'r's in "strawberry".
4.5s352 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Haiku 5.5

The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `.map` is called on nothing. The component destructures the `users` prop, but the parent didn't pass it, or passed `undefined`. ## Common causes **1. The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name** ```jsx <UserList /> // users is undefined <UserList user={users} /> // wrong name: "user" instead of "users" ``` **2. The data hasn't loaded yet (most common with fetched data)** ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />;…
5.1s888 output tokens

Kimi K2.6

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when your component renders. The `.map()` method only works on arrays, so calling it on `undefined` throws this error. This usually happens when: - The parent component hasn't finished fetching data yet - The `users` prop isn't being passed at all - The prop is misspelled in the parent component ## Quick Fix Set a **default value** for the `users` prop: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ## Alternative Fixes **Optional chaining** (renders nothing if undefined): ```jsx {users?.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ```…
71.8s864 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Haiku 5.5

## Issues **Correctness and robustness** 1. **Bare `except:`** catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`, so Ctrl+C may not stop the program. Catch specific exceptions: `requests.RequestException` for network problems and `ValueError` for invalid JSON. 2. **Retries non-retryable errors.** A 404 or 401 won't succeed on retry, so retrying wastes time. Only retry transient failures such as 429, 5xx, timeouts, and connection errors. 3. **Sleeps after the final attempt.** The loop sleeps even when no retry follows. 4. **Fixed sleep with no backoff.** Exponential backoff is the standard approach for retries. 5. **Silent failure.** Every failure returns `[]` with no loggin…
18.1s4096 output tokens

Kimi K2.6

Here is a refactored version followed by a breakdown of the improvements. ### Refactored Function ```python import logging import time from typing import Any import requests logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def fetch_active_items( url: str, *, retries: int = 3, timeout: float = 10.0, backoff: float = 2.0, ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]: """Fetch active items from an API endpoint with retry logic. Args: url: The API endpoint URL. retries: Number of retry attempts for transient failures. timeout: HTTP request timeout in seconds. backoff: Base delay in seconds between retries (linear backoff). Returns: A list of activ…
17.9s4061 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Kimi K2.6?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Haiku 5.5 is $0.5275 and Kimi K2.6 is $3.70 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K2.6 compare?
Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Kimi K2.6 takes 262,144.
Can I use Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K2.6 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-haiku-5-5" or "kimi-k2.6" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Haiku 5.5 and Kimi K2.6 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Haiku 5.5

More comparisons with Kimi K2.6