Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Fugu Ultra v2
Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) and Fugu Ultra v2 (Sakana AI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
 Claude Haiku 5.5 | Fugu Ultra v2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Sakana AI |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.1055 | $5.50 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $0.5275 | $33.00 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $0.3693 | $22.00 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Release date | 10/7/2026 | 9/11/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image, file |
| Throughput (p50) | — | 25000 tokens/s (n=20) |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-02; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.5275 per 1M output tokens, 98% less than Fugu Ultra v2.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Claude Haiku 5.5
There are **3** r's in "strawberry."
1. **Spell out the word:** s, t, r, a, w, b, e, r, r, y
2. **Go through each letter and count the r's:**
- Position 3: **r** (count = 1)
- Position 8: **r** (count = 2)
- Position 9: **r** (count = 3)
3. **Check the rest:** s, t, a, w, b, e, and y are not r's.
Total: **3**
2.4s200 output tokens
Fugu Ultra v2
**Answer: 3**
**Step-by-step reasoning:**
1. **Write out the word letter by letter**, assigning each a position:
| Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | s | no |
| 2 | t | no |
| 3 | **r** | ✅ yes |
| 4 | a | no |
| 5 | w | no |
| 6 | b | no |
| 7 | e | no |
| 8 | **r** | ✅ yes |
| 9 | **r** | ✅ yes |
| 10 | y | no |
2. **Tally the matches:** positions 3, 8, and 9 are 'r'.
3. **Sanity check by chunks:** "straw" contains one 'r' (str**a**w → the r in "str"), and "berry" contains two 'r's (be**rr**y). 1 + 2 = 3.
4. **Verify length:** the letters counted total 10, which matches the length of "strawberry" — so no letter was skipped or double-counted.
**Conclusion:** There a…
10.2s435 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Claude Haiku 5.5
The error means `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `.map` is called on nothing. The component destructures the `users` prop, but the parent didn't pass it, or passed `undefined`.
## Common causes
**1. The parent doesn't pass the prop, or uses a different name**
```jsx
<UserList /> // users is undefined
<UserList user={users} /> // wrong name: "user" instead of "users"
```
**2. The data hasn't loaded yet (most common with fetched data)**
```jsx
function App() {
const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined initially
useEffect(() => {
fetch('/api/users').then(r => r.json()).then(setUsers);
}, []);
return <UserList users={users} />;…
5.1s888 output tokens
Fugu Ultra v2
## What the error means
`TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that when `UserList` rendered, `users` was `undefined`, and JavaScript can't read the `.map` property off `undefined`.
The important detail: **the bug isn't really in `UserList`** — that's just where it surfaces. Destructuring `function UserList({ users })` does *not* throw when the prop is missing; it silently gives you `undefined`. The crash is deferred to the first property access, which is `.map` on line 12.
So the real question is: why is `props.users` not an array?
## Why `users` is undefined
**1. Async data hasn't arrived yet — by far the most common cause.**
```jsx
const [users, setUs…
70.8s5286 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Claude Haiku 5.5
## Issues
**Correctness and robustness**
1. **Bare `except:`** catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`, so Ctrl+C may not stop the program. Catch specific exceptions: `requests.RequestException` for network problems and `ValueError` for invalid JSON.
2. **Retries non-retryable errors.** A 404 or 401 won't succeed on retry, so retrying wastes time. Only retry transient failures such as 429, 5xx, timeouts, and connection errors.
3. **Sleeps after the final attempt.** The loop sleeps even when no retry follows.
4. **Fixed sleep with no backoff.** Exponential backoff is the standard approach for retries.
5. **Silent failure.** Every failure returns `[]` with no loggin…
18.1s4096 output tokens
Fugu Ultra v2
# Final Code Review: `get_data`
The function is compact and its intent is clear, but as written it will **fail silently in production**. Two defects dominate everything else:
1. The bare `except:` swallows every error — including `KeyboardInterrupt` and genuine logic bugs.
2. A total failure and a legitimately empty dataset both return `[]`, so callers cannot tell "the service is down" from "there are no active records."
Together these mean an outage looks exactly like a successful empty response. Everything else below is meaningful improvement; those two are the difference between code that fails loudly and code that fails invisibly.
---
## 1. Correctness and error handling
### 1.1 `e…
281.1s23317 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Fugu Ultra v2?
- Per 1M output tokens, Claude Haiku 5.5 is $0.5275 and Fugu Ultra v2 is $33.00 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Claude Haiku 5.5 and Fugu Ultra v2 compare?
- Claude Haiku 5.5 takes 1,000,000 tokens; Fugu Ultra v2 takes 1,000,000.
- Can I use Claude Haiku 5.5 and Fugu Ultra v2 with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-haiku-5-5" or "fugu-ultra-v2" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Claude Haiku 5.5 and Fugu Ultra v2 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.