Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

anthropic logoClaude Haiku 4.5deepseek logoDeepSeek V4 Pro
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Input (per 1M tokens)¥184.8¥341.32
Output (per 1M tokens)¥924¥684.42
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥647¥684
Context window200,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date10/15/20254/24/2026
Input modalitiesimage, texttext
Arena · overall#120 · ELO 1,412#49 · ELO 1,457
Arena · Japanese#99 · ELO 1,355#18 · ELO 1,462
Arena · coding#86 · ELO 1,479#54 · ELO 1,502

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, DeepSeek V4 Pro: ¥684.42 per 1M output tokens, 26% less than Claude Haiku 4.5.
  • On the Overall arena board, DeepSeek V4 Pro ranks higher (#49; Claude Haiku 4.5 is #120).
  • On the Japanese arena board, DeepSeek V4 Pro ranks higher (#18; Claude Haiku 4.5 is #99).
  • On the Coding arena board, DeepSeek V4 Pro ranks higher (#54; Claude Haiku 4.5 is #86).
  • For long documents, DeepSeek V4 Pro: a 1,048,576-token context window against 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude Haiku 4.5

# Counting the 'r's in "strawberry" Let me go through each letter in the word "strawberry": 1. **s** - not an 'r' 2. **t** - not an 'r' 3. **r** - this is an 'r' ✓ (1st) 4. **a** - not an 'r' 5. **w** - not an 'r' 6. **b** - not an 'r' 7. **e** - not an 'r' 8. **r** - this is an 'r' ✓ (2nd) 9. **r** - this is an 'r' ✓ (3rd) 10. **y** - not an 'r' **Answer: There are 3 'r's in "strawberry"** The 'r's appear in positions 3, 8, and 9 of the word.
4.1s228 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro

The word is "strawberry". Let's count the occurrences of the letter 'r' step by step: 1. Write the word: s t r a w b e r r y 2. Examine each character: - s: not an 'r' - t: not an 'r' - r: is an 'r' → count 1 - a: not an 'r' - w: not an 'r' - b: not an 'r' - e: not an 'r' - r: is an 'r' → count 2 - r: is an 'r' → count 3 - y: not an 'r' 3. Total number of 'r's = 3. Therefore, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry".
7.3s1136 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Claude Haiku 4.5

# TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') This error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. You're trying to call `.map()` on `undefined`, which doesn't have that method. ## Common Causes 1. **Parent component didn't pass the `users` prop** 2. **Async data hasn't loaded yet** 3. **Props passed incorrectly** ## Solutions ### 1. **Provide a Default Value** (Recommended) ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### 2. **Add a Conditional Check** ```javascript function UserList({ users }) { if (!users) { return <p>No users a…
3.9s671 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro

The error is occurring because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you're trying to call `.map()` on it. This typically happens when the data hasn't been loaded yet or wasn't passed correctly to the component. ## Here are several ways to fix this: ### 1. **Add a default value with empty array (Simplest fix)** ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ### 2. **Add a conditional check** ```javascript function UserList({ users }) { if (!users) { return <div>No users found</div>; } return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}<…
6.9s442 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Claude Haiku 4.5

# Code Review and Improvements ## Issues Found 1. **Bare `except`** - Catches all exceptions, hiding bugs 2. **Imports inside function** - Should be at module level 3. **Redundant comparison** - `== True` is unnecessary 4. **No logging** - Hard to debug failures 5. **Magic numbers** - Hardcoded timeout and sleep values 6. **Inefficient retries** - Doesn't retry on 200 with parsing errors 7. **Poor variable names** - `r`, `i` are unclear 8. **No type hints** - Reduces code clarity ## Improved Version ```python import logging import requests import time from typing import Optional from requests.exceptions import RequestException logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def get_data( url:…
5.7s988 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Here’s a review of your `get_data` function, highlighting issues and suggesting improvements. ## Overall Observations - The function works but has several readability, robustness, and maintainability issues. - Imports are inside the function, bare `except` hides errors, and the filtering logic is not Pythonic. - No type hints or docstring, making it harder to use and understand. ## Specific Improvements ### 1. Move Imports to the Top of the Module **Why:** Imports inside a function are executed every time the function is called, which is slightly slower and violates PEP 8 style guidelines. **Before:** ```python def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time # ... `…
40.5s2277 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, Claude Haiku 4.5 is ¥924 and DeepSeek V4 Pro is ¥684.42 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro compare?
Claude Haiku 4.5 takes 200,000 tokens; DeepSeek V4 Pro takes 1,048,576.
Which ranks higher, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
DeepSeek V4 Pro ranks higher on the public arena (Claude Haiku 4.5 #99, DeepSeek V4 Pro #18). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "anthropic-claude-haiku-4-5" or "deepseek-v4-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Claude Haiku 4.5

More comparisons with DeepSeek V4 Pro