Model comparison

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

moonshotai logoKimi K3.1 Proqwen logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
ProviderMoonshotQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.11$2.20
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.55$6.60
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$7.39$5.50
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date10/23/20268/12/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, videotext
Throughput (p50)—52 tokens/s (n=26)
Arena · overallUnrankedUnranked
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · codingUnrankedUnranked

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: $6.60 per 1M output tokens, 37% less than Kimi K3.1 Pro.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Kimi K3.1 Pro

There are **3** ‘r’s in **“strawberry.”** 1. Write out each letter: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** 2. Locate the ‘r’s: positions **3, 8, and 9**. 3. Count them: **1 + 1 + 1 = 3**.
11.3s

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

To count the number of **“r”**s in **“strawberry”**, spell it out letter by letter: **s t r a w b e r r y** Now check each letter: 1. s — not r 2. t — not r 3. r — yes, count 1 4. a — not r 5. w — not r 6. b — not r 7. e — not r 8. r — yes, count 2 9. r — yes, count 3 10. y — not r So there are **3** “r”s in **strawberry**.
1.3s203 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Kimi K3.1 Pro

## What's causing the error The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. The component itself is fine — the problem is that whatever renders `<UserList />` either isn't passing the prop, or is passing a value that isn't an array yet. The most common cause is **async data fetching**: the parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded. ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ❌ undefined on first render useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users') .then(res => res.json()) .then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // users is undefined here initially } ``` On…
36.3s

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when React tries to render this line: ```js {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on `undefined`. In your component: ```js function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` React expects `users` to be an array, but something is rendering `<UserList />` without providing a valid `users` prop. --- ## Common causes ### 1. The parent component is not passing `users` For example: ```js <UserList /> ``` Instead of: ```js <UserList users={users} /> ``` --- ### 2. The data has not loaded yet If `users…
10.9s1318 output tokens

Professional Email

Write a professional email to a client explaining that the project delivery will be delayed by two weeks due to unexpected technical challenges discovered during integration testing. The tone should be apologetic but con…

Kimi K3.1 Pro

**Subject: Revised Delivery Timeline for [Project Name]** Dear [Client Name], I’m writing to inform you that we need to revise the delivery date for [Project Name] from **[Original Delivery Date]** to **[Revised Delivery Date]**, a delay of two weeks. During integration testing, we identified unexpected technical challenges that require additional remediation and retesting before we can confidently release the solution. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience this may cause and understand the importance of the original timeline. After assessing the issues, we determined that taking this additional time is necessary to protect the quality, stability, and long-term success of the deliv…
57.7s

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Subject: Updated Project Timeline – Revised Delivery Date Dear [Client Name], I hope this message finds you well. I’m writing to provide an important update regarding the delivery timeline for [Project Name]. During our recent integration testing phase, we identified several unexpected technical challenges that require additional resolution to ensure the final deliverable meets the quality and performance standards we committed to. After carefully reviewing the scope of these items with our technical team, we have determined that the project delivery will need to be extended by two weeks. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please be assured that we are taking imm…
4.6s449 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Per 1M output tokens, Kimi K3.1 Pro is $10.55 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is $6.60 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compare?
Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576 tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "kimi-k3.1-pro" or "qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Kimi K3.1 Pro

More comparisons with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B