Model comparison

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot) and Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

moonshotai logoKimi K3.1 Prometa logoMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderMoonshotMeta
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.11$1.38
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.55$4.68
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$7.39$3.72
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date10/23/20269/2/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, videotext, image, video, file, audio
Throughput (p50)——
Arena · overallUnranked#10 · ELO 1,496
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#24 · ELO 1,476
Arena · codingUnranked#15 · ELO 1,536

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Muse Spark 1.3: $4.68 per 1M output tokens, 56% less than Kimi K3.1 Pro.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Kimi K3.1 Pro

There are **3** ‘r’s in **“strawberry.”** 1. Write out each letter: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** 2. Locate the ‘r’s: positions **3, 8, and 9**. 3. Count them: **1 + 1 + 1 = 3**.
11.3s

Muse Spark 1.3

The word is **strawberry** — there are **3** 'r's in it. Here's my reasoning step by step: 1. **Write out the word:** strawberry 2. **Break it into individual letters:** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 3. **Go through each letter one by one and check if it is 'r':** 1. s → not r, count = 0 2. t → not r, count = 0 3. r → is r, count = 1 4. a → not r, count = 1 5. w → not r, count = 1 6. b → not r, count = 1 7. e → not r, count = 1 8. r → is r, count = 2 9. r → is r, count = 3 10. y → not r, count = 3 4. **Total up the matches:** The 'r' appears at position 3, 8, and 9. **Final answer: 3**
10.5s1063 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Kimi K3.1 Pro

## What's causing the error The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. The component itself is fine — the problem is that whatever renders `<UserList />` either isn't passing the prop, or is passing a value that isn't an array yet. The most common cause is **async data fetching**: the parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded. ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ❌ undefined on first render useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users') .then(res => res.json()) .then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // users is undefined here initially } ``` On…
36.3s

Muse Spark 1.3

This error means `users` is `undefined` when your component tries to render. `users.map(...)` only works if `users` is an array. On the first render, if you haven't passed the prop yet, or your data hasn't loaded from an API yet, `users` is `undefined`, so JavaScript throws: > Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') This almost always happens in one of these 2 cases: 1. You forgot to pass the prop: ```js <UserList /> // users is undefined! ``` vs. ```js <UserList users={myUsers} /> ``` 2. Your data is async and is `undefined` on the first render: ```js const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined at first! // ... <UserList users={users} /> ``` ### How to fix it **1.…
16.7s1242 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Kimi K3.1 Pro

The timeout and bounded retry loop are good starting points. The biggest issue is that failures—and even programming errors—are silently converted into retries and then `[]`. ### Suggested improvements - **Avoid bare `except:`**. It catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `KeyError`, JSON/schema errors, and other bugs. Retry only expected transient network failures; let malformed responses fail visibly. - **Use a deliberate retry policy**. Retrying `401`, `403`, or `404` usually wastes time. Retry only transient statuses, use exponential backoff, and avoid sleeping after the final attempt. - **Do not use `[]` for both failure and no results**. Prefer raising the final exception so callers can disting…
560.2s

Muse Spark 1.3

Here's a friendly review of your `get_data` function — it works, but there are a few readability, robustness, and performance issues worth fixing: ### 1. Readability Issues **a) Imports inside the function** ```python import requests import time ``` This runs on every call (though Python caches it). Move to the top of the file per PEP 8. **b) Poor variable names & magic numbers** `r`, `i`, `data`, `2`, `10`, `200` don't tell the reader much. **c) `== True` anti-pattern** ```python if item["active"] == True: ``` Just use `if item.get("active"):` or `is True`. The current version will also crash with `KeyError` if `active` is missing. **d) No docstring / type hints** No one knows what `ur…
26.9s2141 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?
Per 1M output tokens, Kimi K3.1 Pro is $10.55 and Muse Spark 1.3 is $4.68 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.3 compare?
Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576 tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.3 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "kimi-k3.1-pro" or "muse-spark-1.3" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.3 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Kimi K3.1 Pro

More comparisons with Muse Spark 1.3