Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax M2.7
Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)
Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot) and MiniMax M2.7 (MiniMax), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
 Kimi K3.1 Pro |  MiniMax M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot | MiniMax |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $2.11 | $0.3165 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $10.55 | $1.27 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $7.39 | $0.9495 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 204,800 tokens |
| Release date | 10/23/2026 | 3/18/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image, video | text |
| Throughput (p50) | — | — |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | #141 · ELO 1,415 |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | #189 · ELO 1,271 |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | #113 · ELO 1,480 |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, MiniMax M2.7: $1.27 per 1M output tokens, 88% less than Kimi K3.1 Pro.
- For long documents, Kimi K3.1 Pro: a 1,048,576-token context window against 204,800 for MiniMax M2.7.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
There are **3** ‘r’s in **“strawberry.”**
1. Write out each letter: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y**
2. Locate the ‘r’s: positions **3, 8, and 9**.
3. Count them: **1 + 1 + 1 = 3**.
11.3s
MiniMax M2.7
**Step‑by‑step counting**
1. Write the word **strawberry** as a sequence of its letters:
`s‑t‑r‑a‑w‑b‑e‑r‑r‑y`
2. Go through each letter and check whether it is the letter **r** (case‑insensitive).
| Position | Letter | Is it “r”? |
|----------|--------|------------|
| 1 | s | No |
| 2 | t | No |
| 3 | **r** | Yes → count = 1 |
| 4 | a | No |
| 5 | w | No |
| 6 | b | No |
| 7 | e | No |
| 8 | **r** | Yes → count = 2 |
| 9 | **r** | Yes → count = 3 |
| 10 | y | No |
3. After checking all ten positions, the total number of times the letter **…
11.1s475 output tokens
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Kimi K3.1 Pro
## What's causing the error
The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. The component itself is fine — the problem is that whatever renders `<UserList />` either isn't passing the prop, or is passing a value that isn't an array yet.
The most common cause is **async data fetching**: the parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded.
```jsx
function App() {
const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ❌ undefined on first render
useEffect(() => {
fetch('/api/users')
.then(res => res.json())
.then(setUsers);
}, []);
return <UserList users={users} />; // users is undefined here initially
}
```
On…
36.3s
MiniMax M2.7
# Fixing the "Cannot read properties of undefined" Error
## The Problem
The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders. The `.map()` method can't be called on `undefined`.
This typically happens when:
- The parent component doesn't pass the `users` prop
- The data is still loading/fetching
- The initial state is `undefined` instead of an empty array
---
## Solutions
### 1. Add a Default Parameter (Recommended)
```javascript
function UserList({ users = [] }) {
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```
### 2. Use Optional Chaining
```javascript
function UserList({ users }) {
return (
<ul>…
14.2s695 output tokens
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Kimi K3.1 Pro
The timeout and bounded retry loop are good starting points. The biggest issue is that failures—and even programming errors—are silently converted into retries and then `[]`.
### Suggested improvements
- **Avoid bare `except:`**. It catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `KeyError`, JSON/schema errors, and other bugs. Retry only expected transient network failures; let malformed responses fail visibly.
- **Use a deliberate retry policy**. Retrying `401`, `403`, or `404` usually wastes time. Retry only transient statuses, use exponential backoff, and avoid sleeping after the final attempt.
- **Do not use `[]` for both failure and no results**. Prefer raising the final exception so callers can disting…
560.2s
MiniMax M2.7
# Code Review: `get_data` Function
## Issues Identified
### 1. **Critical Issues**
```python
# ❌ Bare except clause - catches everything including KeyboardInterrupt
except:
time.sleep(2)
```
```python
# ❌ Comparing to True - redundant comparison
if item["active"] == True:
```
```python
# ❌ No JSON error handling - r.json() can raise ValueError
data = r.json()
```
### 2. **Code Quality Issues**
| Issue | Location | Problem |
|-------|----------|---------|
| Imports inside function | Line 2-3 | Should be at module level |
| Magic numbers | `timeout=10`, `sleep(2)` | Not descriptive |
| No docstring | Function | No documentation |
| No type hints | Function signature | Missing type safet…
31.7s1690 output tokens
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or MiniMax M2.7?
- Per 1M output tokens, Kimi K3.1 Pro is $10.55 and MiniMax M2.7 is $1.27 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiniMax M2.7 compare?
- Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576 tokens; MiniMax M2.7 takes 204,800.
- Can I use Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiniMax M2.7 with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "kimi-k3.1-pro" or "minimax-m2.7" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiniMax M2.7 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.