Model comparison

Kimi K2.6 vs Mercury 2.5

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Kimi K2.6 (Moonshot) and Mercury 2.5 (Inception), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

moonshotai logoKimi K2.6Mercury 2.5
ProviderMoonshotInception
Input (per 1M tokens)¥169.77¥6.77
Output (per 1M tokens)¥714.8¥25.38
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥527¥19
Context window262,144 tokens260,000 tokens
Release date4/20/20269/8/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagetext
Arena · overall#50 · ELO 1,461Unranked
Arena · Japanese#37 · ELO 1,444Unranked
Arena · coding#36 · ELO 1,514Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Mercury 2.5: ¥25.38 per 1M output tokens, 96% less than Kimi K2.6.
  • For long documents, Kimi K2.6: a 262,144-token context window against 260,000 for Mercury 2.5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Kimi K2.6

Here is the step-by-step count: **Step 1:** Write out the word and number each letter. 1. s 2. t 3. **r** ← 1st 'r' 4. a 5. w 6. b 7. e 8. **r** ← 2nd 'r' 9. **r** ← 3rd 'r' 10. y **Step 2:** Identify the positions containing the letter 'r'. - The 3rd letter is **r** - The 8th letter is **r** - The 9th letter is **r** **Step 3:** Tally the total. There are **3** letter 'r's in "strawberry".
4.5s352 output tokens

Mercury 2.5

To determine the number of 'r's in the word "strawberry", we can examine each letter in sequence: 1. **s** - Not 'r' 2. **t** - Not 'r' 3. **r** - First 'r' found 4. **a** - Not 'r' 5. **w** - Not 'r' 6. **b** - Not 'r' 7. **e** - Not 'r' 8. **r** - Second 'r' found 9. **r** - Third 'r' found 10. **y** - Not 'r' Counting these occurrences, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry".
1.8s968 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Kimi K2.6

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when your component renders. The `.map()` method only works on arrays, so calling it on `undefined` throws this error. This usually happens when: - The parent component hasn't finished fetching data yet - The `users` prop isn't being passed at all - The prop is misspelled in the parent component ## Quick Fix Set a **default value** for the `users` prop: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ## Alternative Fixes **Optional chaining** (renders nothing if undefined): ```jsx {users?.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ```…
71.8s864 output tokens

Mercury 2.5

This error occurs because the `users` prop is `undefined` when the component renders. Since the code calls `.map()` on `users`, JavaScript throws a TypeError when `users` is not an array. Here is how to fix it: 1. **Set a Default Value** Update the function signature to default `users` to an empty array if it is not provided: ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { // ... } ``` 2. **Add a Conditional Check** If `users` might be null or undefined during data loading, guard the map operation: ```javascript {users && users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` 3. **Verify Parent Props** Ensure the parent component pas…
2.4s1028 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Kimi K2.6

Here is a refactored version followed by a breakdown of the improvements. ### Refactored Function ```python import logging import time from typing import Any import requests logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def fetch_active_items( url: str, *, retries: int = 3, timeout: float = 10.0, backoff: float = 2.0, ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]: """Fetch active items from an API endpoint with retry logic. Args: url: The API endpoint URL. retries: Number of retry attempts for transient failures. timeout: HTTP request timeout in seconds. backoff: Base delay in seconds between retries (linear backoff). Returns: A list of activ…
17.9s4061 output tokens

Mercury 2.5

Here is a review of the function with suggestions for improvement. ### Key Observations 1. **Imports:** Libraries should be imported at the module level, not inside functions. 2. **Exception Handling:** Bare `except:` clauses catch system exits and interrupts. Use specific exceptions like `requests.exceptions.RequestException`. 3. **Logic & Pythonicity:** * Avoid `== True`; rely on truthiness or `item.get("active")`. * List comprehensions are more concise and efficient than manual appending. 4. **Retry Strategy:** Implement exponential backoff instead of fixed sleeps, and avoid sleeping after the final failed attempt. 5. **Documentation:** Add type hints and a docstring fo…
4.6s1999 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Mercury 2.5?
Per 1M output tokens, Kimi K2.6 is ¥714.8 and Mercury 2.5 is ¥25.38 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Mercury 2.5 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Kimi K2.6 and Mercury 2.5 compare?
Kimi K2.6 takes 262,144 tokens; Mercury 2.5 takes 260,000.
Can I use Kimi K2.6 and Mercury 2.5 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "kimi-k2.6" or "mercury-2.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Kimi K2.6 and Mercury 2.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Kimi K2.6

More comparisons with Mercury 2.5