Model comparison

Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

Kimi K2.6 (Moonshot) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

moonshotai logoKimi K2.6moonshotai logoKimi K3.1 Pro
ProviderMoonshotMoonshot
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.7913$2.11
Output (per 1M tokens)$3.70$10.55
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$2.64$7.39
Context window262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date4/20/202610/23/2026
Input modalitiestext, imagetext, image, video
Throughput (p50)33 tokens/s (n=17)—
Arena · overall#59 · ELO 1,461Unranked
Arena · Japanese#47 · ELO 1,442Unranked
Arena · coding#44 · ELO 1,516Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Kimi K2.6: $3.70 per 1M output tokens, 65% less than Kimi K3.1 Pro.
  • For long documents, Kimi K3.1 Pro: a 1,048,576-token context window against 262,144 for Kimi K2.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Kimi K2.6

Here is the step-by-step count: **Step 1:** Write out the word and number each letter. 1. s 2. t 3. **r** ← 1st 'r' 4. a 5. w 6. b 7. e 8. **r** ← 2nd 'r' 9. **r** ← 3rd 'r' 10. y **Step 2:** Identify the positions containing the letter 'r'. - The 3rd letter is **r** - The 8th letter is **r** - The 9th letter is **r** **Step 3:** Tally the total. There are **3** letter 'r's in "strawberry".
4.5s352 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

There are **3** ‘r’s in **“strawberry.”** 1. Write out each letter: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** 2. Locate the ‘r’s: positions **3, 8, and 9**. 3. Count them: **1 + 1 + 1 = 3**.
11.3s

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Kimi K2.6

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when your component renders. The `.map()` method only works on arrays, so calling it on `undefined` throws this error. This usually happens when: - The parent component hasn't finished fetching data yet - The `users` prop isn't being passed at all - The prop is misspelled in the parent component ## Quick Fix Set a **default value** for the `users` prop: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ## Alternative Fixes **Optional chaining** (renders nothing if undefined): ```jsx {users?.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ```…
71.8s864 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

## What's causing the error The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. The component itself is fine — the problem is that whatever renders `<UserList />` either isn't passing the prop, or is passing a value that isn't an array yet. The most common cause is **async data fetching**: the parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded. ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ❌ undefined on first render useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users') .then(res => res.json()) .then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // users is undefined here initially } ``` On…
36.3s

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Kimi K2.6

Here is a refactored version followed by a breakdown of the improvements. ### Refactored Function ```python import logging import time from typing import Any import requests logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def fetch_active_items( url: str, *, retries: int = 3, timeout: float = 10.0, backoff: float = 2.0, ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]: """Fetch active items from an API endpoint with retry logic. Args: url: The API endpoint URL. retries: Number of retry attempts for transient failures. timeout: HTTP request timeout in seconds. backoff: Base delay in seconds between retries (linear backoff). Returns: A list of activ…
17.9s4061 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

The timeout and bounded retry loop are good starting points. The biggest issue is that failures—and even programming errors—are silently converted into retries and then `[]`. ### Suggested improvements - **Avoid bare `except:`**. It catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `KeyError`, JSON/schema errors, and other bugs. Retry only expected transient network failures; let malformed responses fail visibly. - **Use a deliberate retry policy**. Retrying `401`, `403`, or `404` usually wastes time. Retry only transient statuses, use exponential backoff, and avoid sleeping after the final attempt. - **Do not use `[]` for both failure and no results**. Prefer raising the final exception so callers can disting…
560.2s

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, Kimi K2.6 is $3.70 and Kimi K3.1 Pro is $10.55 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Kimi K2.6 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Kimi K2.6 and Kimi K3.1 Pro compare?
Kimi K2.6 takes 262,144 tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Kimi K2.6 and Kimi K3.1 Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "kimi-k2.6" or "kimi-k3.1-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Kimi K2.6 and Kimi K3.1 Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Kimi K2.6

More comparisons with Kimi K3.1 Pro