Model comparison

Inkling vs Mercury 2.5

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

Inkling (Thinking Machines) and Mercury 2.5 (Inception), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

InklingMercury 2.5
ProviderThinking MachinesInception
Input (per 1M tokens)¥178.7¥6.77
Output (per 1M tokens)¥723.74¥25.38
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥541¥19
Context window524,288 tokens260,000 tokens
Release date7/17/20269/8/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, audiotext
Arena · overall#83 · ELO 1,439Unranked
Arena · Japanese#54 · ELO 1,422Unranked
Arena · coding#77 · ELO 1,491Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Mercury 2.5: ¥25.38 per 1M output tokens, 96% less than Inkling.
  • For long documents, Inkling: a 524,288-token context window against 260,000 for Mercury 2.5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Inkling

Let's break down the word **"strawberry"** letter by letter: 1. **s** 2. **t** 3. **r** ← (1st 'r') 4. **a** 5. **w** 6. **b** 7. **e** 8. **r** ← (2nd 'r') 9. **r** ← (3rd 'r') 10. **y** So the spelling is: s-t-**r**-a-w-b-e-**r**-**r**-y Counting them up: - One 'r' in "str" (the 3rd letter) - Two 'r's in "berry" (the 8th and 9th letters) **Total: 3 'r's** in "strawberry".**
2.4s417 output tokens

Mercury 2.5

To determine the number of 'r's in the word "strawberry", we can examine each letter in sequence: 1. **s** - Not 'r' 2. **t** - Not 'r' 3. **r** - First 'r' found 4. **a** - Not 'r' 5. **w** - Not 'r' 6. **b** - Not 'r' 7. **e** - Not 'r' 8. **r** - Second 'r' found 9. **r** - Third 'r' found 10. **y** - Not 'r' Counting these occurrences, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry".
1.8s968 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Inkling

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map` fails. This usually happens when: - The parent doesn't pass the prop (`<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={...} />`) - Data is still loading (e.g., API hasn't returned yet) ## Quick Fix Provide a default empty array so `.map` always has an array to work with: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Alternatively, guard against undefined explicitly: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { if (!users) return null; // or a loading state return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={…
4.9s585 output tokens

Mercury 2.5

This error occurs because the `users` prop is `undefined` when the component renders. Since the code calls `.map()` on `users`, JavaScript throws a TypeError when `users` is not an array. Here is how to fix it: 1. **Set a Default Value** Update the function signature to default `users` to an empty array if it is not provided: ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { // ... } ``` 2. **Add a Conditional Check** If `users` might be null or undefined during data loading, guard the map operation: ```javascript {users && users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` 3. **Verify Parent Props** Ensure the parent component pas…
2.4s1028 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Inkling

Here is a review with an improved version followed by explanations. ### Issues in the original - **Imports inside the function**: Re-importing on every call is inefficient. - **Bare `except:`**: Catches `SystemExit`, `KeyboardInterrupt`, etc. - **Silent failures**: No logging; errors disappear. - **Magic numbers**: `10`, `2`, `200` are hard-coded. - **Data validation missing**: Assumes `data` is a list and every item has `"active"`, `"name"`, and `"id"` (will crash with `KeyError`). - **Performance**: Uses `.append()` in a loop instead of a list comprehension. - **Ambiguous return**: `[]` means both "success with no results" and "total failure". ### Improved version ```python import loggi…
54.1s5649 output tokens

Mercury 2.5

Here is a review of the function with suggestions for improvement. ### Key Observations 1. **Imports:** Libraries should be imported at the module level, not inside functions. 2. **Exception Handling:** Bare `except:` clauses catch system exits and interrupts. Use specific exceptions like `requests.exceptions.RequestException`. 3. **Logic & Pythonicity:** * Avoid `== True`; rely on truthiness or `item.get("active")`. * List comprehensions are more concise and efficient than manual appending. 4. **Retry Strategy:** Implement exponential backoff instead of fixed sleeps, and avoid sleeping after the final failed attempt. 5. **Documentation:** Add type hints and a docstring fo…
4.6s1999 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Inkling or Mercury 2.5?
Per 1M output tokens, Inkling is ¥723.74 and Mercury 2.5 is ¥25.38 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Mercury 2.5 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Inkling and Mercury 2.5 compare?
Inkling takes 524,288 tokens; Mercury 2.5 takes 260,000.
Can I use Inkling and Mercury 2.5 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "inkling" or "mercury-2.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Inkling and Mercury 2.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Inkling

More comparisons with Mercury 2.5