Model comparison

Inkling vs Kimi K2.6

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

Inkling (Thinkingmachines) and Kimi K2.6 (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

Inklingmoonshotai logoKimi K2.6
ProviderThinkingmachinesMoonshot
Input (per 1M tokens)¥178.7¥169.77
Output (per 1M tokens)¥723.74¥714.8
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥541¥527
Context window524,288 tokens262,144 tokens
Release date7/17/20264/20/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, audiotext, image
Arena · overall#71 · ELO 1,443#41 · ELO 1,461
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#25 · ELO 1,449
Arena · coding#64 · ELO 1,496#30 · ELO 1,515

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Kimi K2.6: ¥714.8 per 1M output tokens, 1% less than Inkling.
  • On the Overall arena board, Kimi K2.6 ranks higher (#41; Inkling is #71).
  • On the Coding arena board, Kimi K2.6 ranks higher (#30; Inkling is #64).
  • For long documents, Inkling: a 524,288-token context window against 262,144 for Kimi K2.6.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Inkling

Let's break down the word **"strawberry"** letter by letter: 1. **s** 2. **t** 3. **r** ← (1st 'r') 4. **a** 5. **w** 6. **b** 7. **e** 8. **r** ← (2nd 'r') 9. **r** ← (3rd 'r') 10. **y** So the spelling is: s-t-**r**-a-w-b-e-**r**-**r**-y Counting them up: - One 'r' in "str" (the 3rd letter) - Two 'r's in "berry" (the 8th and 9th letters) **Total: 3 'r's** in "strawberry".**
2.4s417 output tokens

Kimi K2.6

Here is the step-by-step count: **Step 1:** Write out the word and number each letter. 1. s 2. t 3. **r** ← 1st 'r' 4. a 5. w 6. b 7. e 8. **r** ← 2nd 'r' 9. **r** ← 3rd 'r' 10. y **Step 2:** Identify the positions containing the letter 'r'. - The 3rd letter is **r** - The 8th letter is **r** - The 9th letter is **r** **Step 3:** Tally the total. There are **3** letter 'r's in "strawberry".
4.5s352 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Inkling

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map` fails. This usually happens when: - The parent doesn't pass the prop (`<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={...} />`) - Data is still loading (e.g., API hasn't returned yet) ## Quick Fix Provide a default empty array so `.map` always has an array to work with: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Alternatively, guard against undefined explicitly: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { if (!users) return null; // or a loading state return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={…
4.9s585 output tokens

Kimi K2.6

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when your component renders. The `.map()` method only works on arrays, so calling it on `undefined` throws this error. This usually happens when: - The parent component hasn't finished fetching data yet - The `users` prop isn't being passed at all - The prop is misspelled in the parent component ## Quick Fix Set a **default value** for the `users` prop: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` ## Alternative Fixes **Optional chaining** (renders nothing if undefined): ```jsx {users?.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ```…
71.8s864 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Inkling

Here is a review with an improved version followed by explanations. ### Issues in the original - **Imports inside the function**: Re-importing on every call is inefficient. - **Bare `except:`**: Catches `SystemExit`, `KeyboardInterrupt`, etc. - **Silent failures**: No logging; errors disappear. - **Magic numbers**: `10`, `2`, `200` are hard-coded. - **Data validation missing**: Assumes `data` is a list and every item has `"active"`, `"name"`, and `"id"` (will crash with `KeyError`). - **Performance**: Uses `.append()` in a loop instead of a list comprehension. - **Ambiguous return**: `[]` means both "success with no results" and "total failure". ### Improved version ```python import loggi…
54.1s5649 output tokens

Kimi K2.6

Here is a refactored version followed by a breakdown of the improvements. ### Refactored Function ```python import logging import time from typing import Any import requests logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def fetch_active_items( url: str, *, retries: int = 3, timeout: float = 10.0, backoff: float = 2.0, ) -> list[dict[str, Any]]: """Fetch active items from an API endpoint with retry logic. Args: url: The API endpoint URL. retries: Number of retry attempts for transient failures. timeout: HTTP request timeout in seconds. backoff: Base delay in seconds between retries (linear backoff). Returns: A list of activ…
17.9s4061 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Inkling or Kimi K2.6?
Per 1M output tokens, Inkling is ¥723.74 and Kimi K2.6 is ¥714.8 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Kimi K2.6 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Inkling and Kimi K2.6 compare?
Inkling takes 524,288 tokens; Kimi K2.6 takes 262,144.
Which ranks higher, Inkling or Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.6 ranks higher on the public arena (Inkling #71, Kimi K2.6 #25). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use Inkling and Kimi K2.6 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "inkling" or "kimi-k2.6" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Inkling and Kimi K2.6 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Inkling

More comparisons with Kimi K2.6