Model comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.5

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) and Grok 4.5 (xAI), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-6 Astrax-ai logoGrok 4.5
ProviderOpenAIxAI
Input (per 1M tokens)¥1,717.72¥357.4
Output (per 1M tokens)¥8,588.62¥1,072.2
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥6,012¥894
Context window1,050,000 tokens500,000 tokens
Release date9/4/20267/8/2026
Input modalitiesfile, image, texttext, image, file
Arena · overallUnranked#38 · ELO 1,471
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#35 · ELO 1,445
Arena · codingUnranked#22 · ELO 1,523

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Grok 4.5: ¥1,072.2 per 1M output tokens, 88% less than GPT-6 Astra.
  • For long documents, GPT-6 Astra: a 1,050,000-token context window against 500,000 for Grok 4.5.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-6 Astra

“strawberry” is spelled **s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y**. The letter **r** appears in positions **3, 8, and 9**, so there are **3 r’s**.
3.8s85 output tokens

Grok 4.5

The word "strawberry" is spelled as follows: **s-t-r-a-w-b-e-r-r-y** - Position 1: **s** - Position 2: **t** - Position 3: **r** ← (1st "r") - Position 4: **a** - Position 5: **w** - Position 6: **b** - Position 7: **e** - Position 8: **r** ← (2nd "r") - Position 9: **r** ← (3rd "r") - Position 10: **y** There are **3** occurrences of the letter "r".
6.5s350 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-6 Astra

The error means **`users` is `undefined` when React renders `UserList`**, so calling `users.map(...)` fails. This commonly happens when the parent doesn’t pass the prop or when data hasn’t finished loading. ### 1. Default `users` to an empty array If an absent prop should mean “no users,” use a default value: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` This handles a missing or `undefined` prop, but **not `null` or other non-array values**. ### 2. Check where the prop comes from Make sure the parent passes an array. For data loaded asynchronously, initialize state to…
6.7s380 output tokens

Grok 4.5

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, so calling `.map()` on it fails. This commonly happens when: - The parent component doesn’t pass a `users` prop at all - The data is loaded asynchronously and is still `undefined` on the first render - The prop is accidentally set to `undefined`/`null` instead of an array ### Fixes **1. Default to an empty array (simplest)** ```js function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => ( <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li> ))} </ul> ); } ``` **2. Optional chaining (also fine)** ```js function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users?.map(user => (…
7.9s507 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-6 Astra

The function is compact, but its biggest issue is that **all failures silently become `[]`**, making an unavailable API indistinguishable from a successful response with no active items. ### Suggested improvements - **Move imports to module scope** for clarity and conventional organization. - **Avoid bare `except:`.** It catches everything, including `KeyboardInterrupt`, and hides bugs such as missing dictionary keys. - **Retry only transient failures**, such as connection errors, timeouts, rate limiting, and selected server errors. Retrying a `401` or `404` usually won’t help. - **Don’t sleep after the final failed attempt.** Use exponential backoff rather than a fixed delay. - **Use desc…
19.2s965 output tokens

Grok 4.5

## Code Review: `get_data` ### Issues | Area | Problem | |------|---------| | **Imports** | `requests` / `time` inside the function — re-imported on every call; belong at module level | | **Exceptions** | Bare `except:` swallows `KeyboardInterrupt`, `SystemExit`, and hides bugs | | **Boolean check** | `item["active"] == True` is unidiomatic; truthiness is enough | | **Loop** | Manual `for` + `append` can be a list comprehension | | **Retries** | Sleeps on non-200 but never logs or distinguishes failure modes; unused loop variable `i` | | **Robustness** | No guard for non-list JSON, missing keys (`KeyError`), or invalid JSON | | **API** | Magic numbers (`timeout=10`, `sleep=2`); no docstrin…
25.3s1363 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra or Grok 4.5?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-6 Astra is ¥8,588.62 and Grok 4.5 is ¥1,072.2 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Grok 4.5 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-6 Astra and Grok 4.5 compare?
GPT-6 Astra takes 1,050,000 tokens; Grok 4.5 takes 500,000.
Can I use GPT-6 Astra and Grok 4.5 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-6-astra" or "grok-4.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-6 Astra and Grok 4.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-6 Astra

More comparisons with Grok 4.5