Model comparison

GPT-5 Mini vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

GPT-5 Mini (OpenAI) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

openai logoGPT-5 Minimoonshotai logoKimi K3.1 Pro
ProviderOpenAIMoonshot
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.2638$2.11
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.11$10.55
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$1.32$7.39
Context window400,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date8/7/202510/23/2026
Input modalitiestext, image, filetext, image, video
Throughput (p50)——
Arena · overall#179 · ELO 1,390Unranked
Arena · Japanese#125 · ELO 1,364Unranked
Arena · coding#187 · ELO 1,432Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GPT-5 Mini: $2.11 per 1M output tokens, 80% less than Kimi K3.1 Pro.
  • For long documents, Kimi K3.1 Pro: a 1,048,576-token context window against 400,000 for GPT-5 Mini.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GPT-5 Mini

We examine the word "strawberry" letter by letter: 1. s — not an r (count = 0) 2. t — not an r (count = 0) 3. r — an r (count = 1) 4. a — not an r (count = 1) 5. w — not an r (count = 1) 6. b — not an r (count = 1) 7. e — not an r (count = 1) 8. r — an r (count = 2) 9. r — an r (count = 3) 10. y — not an r (count = 3) Total number of 'r's = 3.
5.2s382 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

There are **3** ‘r’s in **“strawberry.”** 1. Write out each letter: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** 2. Locate the ‘r’s: positions **3, 8, and 9**. 3. Count them: **1 + 1 + 1 = 3**.
11.3s

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GPT-5 Mini

That error means users is undefined when you call users.map(...). map is an Array method, so calling it on undefined throws "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')". Common causes - The parent component didn't pass a users prop. - users is still loading (e.g. fetched asynchronously) and is null/undefined until the fetch completes. - The parent initialized users to null instead of an empty array. How to fix Choose one or more of these approaches depending on your app: 1) Initialize the parent state as an array If users is state in the parent, initialize it to [] so the child always receives an array: const [users, setUsers] = useState([]); // fetch and setUsers(data) 2) Give…
8.0s966 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

## What's causing the error The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. The component itself is fine — the problem is that whatever renders `<UserList />` either isn't passing the prop, or is passing a value that isn't an array yet. The most common cause is **async data fetching**: the parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded. ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ❌ undefined on first render useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users') .then(res => res.json()) .then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // users is undefined here initially } ``` On…
36.3s

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GPT-5 Mini

Thanks — this is a nice simple function, but it can be improved in several ways: move imports to module scope, avoid broad except:, use connection pooling (Session) for performance, use specific exception types, add logging and docstring, avoid comparing to True, use list comprehensions, validate JSON shape, and implement backoff (or use urllib3 Retry). Below are two improved alternatives and a short rationale for the changes. 1) A simple, clear improvement (small changes, explicit errors, backoff + jitter) - Moves imports to top-level - Uses requests.Session for connection pooling - Catches specific exceptions (requests.RequestException, ValueError) - Uses list comprehension and item.get(…
13.6s1702 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

The timeout and bounded retry loop are good starting points. The biggest issue is that failures—and even programming errors—are silently converted into retries and then `[]`. ### Suggested improvements - **Avoid bare `except:`**. It catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `KeyError`, JSON/schema errors, and other bugs. Retry only expected transient network failures; let malformed responses fail visibly. - **Use a deliberate retry policy**. Retrying `401`, `403`, or `404` usually wastes time. Retry only transient statuses, use exponential backoff, and avoid sleeping after the final attempt. - **Do not use `[]` for both failure and no results**. Prefer raising the final exception so callers can disting…
560.2s

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Mini or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, GPT-5 Mini is $2.11 and Kimi K3.1 Pro is $10.55 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so GPT-5 Mini is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GPT-5 Mini and Kimi K3.1 Pro compare?
GPT-5 Mini takes 400,000 tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576.
Can I use GPT-5 Mini and Kimi K3.1 Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-5-mini" or "kimi-k3.1-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GPT-5 Mini and Kimi K3.1 Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GPT-5 Mini

More comparisons with Kimi K3.1 Pro