GPT-4o-mini vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)
GPT-4o-mini (OpenAI) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
 GPT-4o-mini |  Kimi K3.1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Moonshot |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.1583 | $2.11 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $0.633 | $10.55 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $0.4748 | $7.39 |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Release date | 7/18/2024 | 10/23/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image, video |
| Throughput (p50) | 124 tokens/s (n=27) | — |
| Arena · overall | #267 · ELO 1,318 | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | #204 · ELO 1,251 | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | #275 · ELO 1,348 | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, GPT-4o-mini: $0.633 per 1M output tokens, 94% less than Kimi K3.1 Pro.
- For long documents, Kimi K3.1 Pro: a 1,048,576-token context window against 128,000 for GPT-4o-mini.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
GPT-4o-mini
To count the number of 'r's in the word "strawberry," we can follow these steps:
1. **Identify the word**: We have the word "strawberry."
2. **Break down the letters**: Let's write out the letters in the word:
- s
- t
- r
- a
- w
- b
- e
- r
- r
- y
3. **Locate the 'r's**: Now, we need to look for the letter 'r' among these letters.
- In the list of letters, we can see:
- The first 'r' is in the 3rd position.
- The second 'r' is in the 8th position.
- The third 'r' is in the 9th position.
4. **Count the occurrences**: We check each position we identified:
- There are three occurrences of 'r' in the word "strawberry."
5. **Conclusion**:…
2.1s239 output tokens
Kimi K3.1 Pro
There are **3** ‘r’s in **“strawberry.”**
1. Write out each letter: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y**
2. Locate the ‘r’s: positions **3, 8, and 9**.
3. Count them: **1 + 1 + 1 = 3**.
11.3s
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
GPT-4o-mini
The error you're encountering, `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')`, indicates that the `users` prop is `undefined` when you try to call the `map` method on it.
In your `UserList` component, you're attempting to use `users.map(...)`, but if the `users` prop is not provided or is `undefined`, this will throw an error.
### Fixing the Error
1. **Default Props**: You can set a default value for the `users` prop to prevent the error when it is `undefined`.
```jsx
function UserList({ users = [] }) { // Default to an empty array
return (
<ul>
{users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)}
</ul>
);
}
```…
5.0s511 output tokens
Kimi K3.1 Pro
## What's causing the error
The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. The component itself is fine — the problem is that whatever renders `<UserList />` either isn't passing the prop, or is passing a value that isn't an array yet.
The most common cause is **async data fetching**: the parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded.
```jsx
function App() {
const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ❌ undefined on first render
useEffect(() => {
fetch('/api/users')
.then(res => res.json())
.then(setUsers);
}, []);
return <UserList users={users} />; // users is undefined here initially
}
```
On…
36.3s
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
GPT-4o-mini
Your Python function, `get_data`, essentially performs a GET request, handles retries on failure, and processes the response JSON to return a filtered list of dictionaries. Below, I've highlighted several improvements regarding readability, performance, and best practices:
1. **Avoid blanket exceptions**: It’s best practice to specify which exceptions you expect, allowing for better debugging and error handling.
2. **Use `requests` built-in exception handling**: Handle specific requests exceptions, such as `requests.exceptions.RequestException`.
3. **Improve condition checks**: Check for `item['active']` directly instead of comparing to `True`, which is more Pythonic.
4. **Use `time.sl…
8.8s628 output tokens
Kimi K3.1 Pro
The timeout and bounded retry loop are good starting points. The biggest issue is that failures—and even programming errors—are silently converted into retries and then `[]`.
### Suggested improvements
- **Avoid bare `except:`**. It catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `KeyError`, JSON/schema errors, and other bugs. Retry only expected transient network failures; let malformed responses fail visibly.
- **Use a deliberate retry policy**. Retrying `401`, `403`, or `404` usually wastes time. Retry only transient statuses, use exponential backoff, and avoid sleeping after the final attempt.
- **Do not use `[]` for both failure and no results**. Prefer raising the final exception so callers can disting…
560.2s
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
- Per 1M output tokens, GPT-4o-mini is $0.633 and Kimi K3.1 Pro is $10.55 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so GPT-4o-mini is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of GPT-4o-mini and Kimi K3.1 Pro compare?
- GPT-4o-mini takes 128,000 tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576.
- Can I use GPT-4o-mini and Kimi K3.1 Pro with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gpt-4o-mini" or "kimi-k3.1-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call GPT-4o-mini and Kimi K3.1 Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.