Model comparison

GLM 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GLM 5.1 (Z.ai) and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (Qwen), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 5.1qwen logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
ProviderZ.aiQwen
Input (per 1M tokens)¥250.18¥351.83
Output (per 1M tokens)¥786.28¥1,055.5
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥643¥880
Context window204,800 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date4/7/20268/12/2026
Input modalitiestexttext
Arena · overall#41 · ELO 1,466Unranked
Arena · Japanese#49 · ELO 1,430Unranked
Arena · coding#36 · ELO 1,514Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.1: ¥786.28 per 1M output tokens, 26% less than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
  • For long documents, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: a 1,048,576-token context window against 204,800 for GLM 5.1.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 5.1

There are **3** 'r's in the word "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step reasoning: 1. Let's break down the word "strawberry" letter by letter: s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 2. Now, let's check each letter one by one to see if it is an 'r': - **s**: not an 'r' - **t**: not an 'r' - **r**: this is the 1st 'r' - **a**: not an 'r' - **w**: not an 'r' - **b**: not an 'r' - **e**: not an 'r' - **r**: this is the 2nd 'r' - **r**: this is the 3rd 'r' - **y**: not an 'r' 3. Counting them up, there are three 'r's in total (in the 3rd, 8th, and 9th positions).
7.3s565 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

To count the number of **“r”**s in **“strawberry”**, spell it out letter by letter: **s t r a w b e r r y** Now check each letter: 1. s — not r 2. t — not r 3. r — yes, count 1 4. a — not r 5. w — not r 6. b — not r 7. e — not r 8. r — yes, count 2 9. r — yes, count 3 10. y — not r So there are **3** “r”s in **strawberry**.
1.3s203 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 5.1

### What is causing the error? The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means you are trying to call the `.map()` method on a variable that is `undefined`. In your code, the variable is `users`. When the `UserList` component renders, the `users` prop is `undefined`, so `undefined.map()` throws an error. ### Why is `users` undefined? This usually happens for one of two reasons: 1. **You forgot to pass the prop:** The parent component rendering `<UserList />` is not passing the `users` attribute (e.g., `<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={myUsers} />`). 2. **Async Data Fetching:** You are fetching the users from an API. On the initial render, befor…
45.0s1680 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

The error happens because `users` is `undefined` when React tries to render this line: ```js {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` JavaScript cannot call `.map()` on `undefined`. In your component: ```js function UserList({ users }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` React expects `users` to be an array, but something is rendering `<UserList />` without providing a valid `users` prop. --- ## Common causes ### 1. The parent component is not passing `users` For example: ```js <UserList /> ``` Instead of: ```js <UserList users={users} /> ``` --- ### 2. The data has not loaded yet If `users…
10.9s1318 output tokens

Professional Email

Write a professional email to a client explaining that the project delivery will be delayed by two weeks due to unexpected technical challenges discovered during integration testing. The tone should be apologetic but con…

GLM 5.1

Subject: Project Update: Revised Timeline for [Project Name] Dear [Client Name], I am writing to provide a transparent update regarding the progress of [Project Name]. During our recent integration testing phase, our team uncovered unexpected technical challenges that require additional time to resolve correctly. While we had anticipated standard integration adjustments, the specific complexities we encountered demand a more thorough approach to ensure the system's stability and performance. As a result, we must adjust our final delivery date by two weeks. Our new projected delivery date is [New Delivery Date]. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this delay may cause to your…
22.5s1618 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Subject: Updated Project Timeline – Revised Delivery Date Dear [Client Name], I hope this message finds you well. I’m writing to provide an important update regarding the delivery timeline for [Project Name]. During our recent integration testing phase, we identified several unexpected technical challenges that require additional resolution to ensure the final deliverable meets the quality and performance standards we committed to. After carefully reviewing the scope of these items with our technical team, we have determined that the project delivery will need to be extended by two weeks. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please be assured that we are taking imm…
4.6s449 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.1 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.1 is ¥786.28 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is ¥1,055.5 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.1 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compare?
GLM 5.1 takes 204,800 tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B takes 1,048,576.
Can I use GLM 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.1" or "qwen3.8-2.4t-a95b" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 5.1

More comparisons with Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B