Model comparison

GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GLM 5.1 (Z.ai) and GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 5.1z-ai logoGLM 5.3 Flash
ProviderZ.aiZ.ai
Input (per 1M tokens)¥250.18¥13.19
Output (per 1M tokens)¥786.28¥43.98
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥643¥35
Context window204,800 tokens1,310,720 tokens
Release date4/7/20268/26/2026
Input modalitiestexttext, image, video
Arena · overall#41 · ELO 1,466#38 · ELO 1,469
Arena · Japanese#49 · ELO 1,430Unranked
Arena · coding#36 · ELO 1,514#11 · ELO 1,531

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 5.3 Flash: ¥43.98 per 1M output tokens, 94% less than GLM 5.1.
  • On the Overall arena board, GLM 5.3 Flash ranks higher (#38; GLM 5.1 is #41).
  • On the Coding arena board, GLM 5.3 Flash ranks higher (#11; GLM 5.1 is #36).
  • For long documents, GLM 5.3 Flash: a 1,310,720-token context window against 204,800 for GLM 5.1.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 5.1

There are **3** 'r's in the word "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step reasoning: 1. Let's break down the word "strawberry" letter by letter: s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 2. Now, let's check each letter one by one to see if it is an 'r': - **s**: not an 'r' - **t**: not an 'r' - **r**: this is the 1st 'r' - **a**: not an 'r' - **w**: not an 'r' - **b**: not an 'r' - **e**: not an 'r' - **r**: this is the 2nd 'r' - **r**: this is the 3rd 'r' - **y**: not an 'r' 3. Counting them up, there are three 'r's in total (in the 3rd, 8th, and 9th positions).
7.3s565 output tokens

GLM 5.3 Flash

# Counting 'r's in 'strawberry' **Step 1: Write out the word letter by letter** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y **Step 2: Check each letter one at a time** | Position | Letter | Is it 'r'? | |----------|--------|-----------| | 1 | s | No | | 2 | t | No | | 3 | r | **Yes! (1)** | | 4 | a | No | | 5 | w | No | | 6 | b | No | | 7 | e | No | | 8 | r | **Yes! (2)** | | 9 | r | **Yes! (3)** | | 10 | y | No | **Step 3: Add up the matches** The 'r's appear at positions 3, 8, and 9. ## Answer: There are **3** 'r's in "strawberry" 🍓
7.2s449 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 5.1

### What is causing the error? The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means you are trying to call the `.map()` method on a variable that is `undefined`. In your code, the variable is `users`. When the `UserList` component renders, the `users` prop is `undefined`, so `undefined.map()` throws an error. ### Why is `users` undefined? This usually happens for one of two reasons: 1. **You forgot to pass the prop:** The parent component rendering `<UserList />` is not passing the `users` attribute (e.g., `<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={myUsers} />`). 2. **Async Data Fetching:** You are fetching the users from an API. On the initial render, befor…
45.0s1680 output tokens

GLM 5.3 Flash

## What's happening The error means the `users` prop is `undefined` at the time `UserList` renders. Since you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`, JavaScript throws the TypeError. This usually happens for one of these reasons: 1. **The parent isn't passing the prop** — rendering `<UserList />` without `users`, or with a typo'd prop name like `user={users}`. 2. **Data hasn't loaded yet** — the parent fetches data asynchronously and its state starts as `undefined`: ```jsx const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined until fetch resolves! return <UserList users={users} />; ``` 3. **API response shape mismatch** — the array is nested, e.g., you need `response.data.users` inst…
31.3s1639 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 5.1

Here is a review of your function, broken down by areas for improvement, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### Key Areas for Improvement 1. **Imports Inside the Function:** Placing `import` statements inside a function is generally discouraged in Python. It slows down the function execution every time it is called, and it violates PEP 8 (the Python style guide). Imports should always be at the top of the module. 2. **Bare `except` Clause:** Using a bare `except:` catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`, which makes it hard to terminate a hanging program. You should catch specific exceptions (like `requests.exceptions.RequestException`). 3. *…
70.3s2854 output tokens

GLM 5.3 Flash

Solid foundation — you're already passing an explicit `timeout` and implementing retries, which many people skip. Here's a breakdown by category: ## Correctness & robustness (most important) - **Bare `except:`** catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` and `SystemExit`, and silently discards the error. Catch specific exceptions: `requests.RequestException` for network issues, `ValueError` for invalid JSON. - **Retrying non-retryable failures**: a 401/403/404 will never succeed on retry, so you're sleeping 6 seconds for nothing. Only retry transient errors (5xx, 429, timeouts/connection errors). - **`item["active"]` raises `KeyError`** on malformed data. Use `item.get("active")`…
116.1s6185 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.1 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 5.1 is ¥786.28 and GLM 5.3 Flash is ¥43.98 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash compare?
GLM 5.1 takes 204,800 tokens; GLM 5.3 Flash takes 1,310,720.
Which ranks higher, GLM 5.1 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash ranks higher on the public arena (GLM 5.1 #49, GLM 5.3 Flash #38). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use GLM 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-5.1" or "glm-5.3-flash" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 5.1

More comparisons with GLM 5.3 Flash