Model comparison

GLM 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GLM 4.7 (Z.ai) and Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 4.7meta logoMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderZ.aiMeta
Input (per 1M tokens)¥107.22¥219.9
Output (per 1M tokens)¥393.14¥747.65
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥304¥594
Context window202,752 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date12/22/20259/2/2026
Input modalitiestexttext, image, video, file, audio
Arena · overall#81 · ELO 1,442Unranked
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · coding#89 · ELO 1,485Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 4.7: ¥393.14 per 1M output tokens, 47% less than Muse Spark 1.3.
  • For long documents, Muse Spark 1.3: a 1,048,576-token context window against 202,752 for GLM 4.7.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 4.7

There are **3** "r"s in "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step reasoning: 1. **Break down the word into individual letters:** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 2. **Identify the position of each 'r':** * The 3rd letter is **r**. * The 8th letter is **r**. * The 9th letter is **r**. 3. **Count the total occurrences:** 1 + 1 + 1 = 3.
23.3s685 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3

The word is **strawberry** — there are **3** 'r's in it. Here's my reasoning step by step: 1. **Write out the word:** strawberry 2. **Break it into individual letters:** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 3. **Go through each letter one by one and check if it is 'r':** 1. s → not r, count = 0 2. t → not r, count = 0 3. r → is r, count = 1 4. a → not r, count = 1 5. w → not r, count = 1 6. b → not r, count = 1 7. e → not r, count = 1 8. r → is r, count = 2 9. r → is r, count = 3 10. y → not r, count = 3 4. **Total up the matches:** The 'r' appears at position 3, 8, and 9. **Final answer: 3**
10.5s1063 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 4.7

### The Cause The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that the variable `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to render. In React, this typically happens for one of two reasons: 1. The **Parent Component** is not passing the `users` prop to `UserList`. 2. The **Parent Component** passed the prop, but the data hasn't loaded yet (e.g., an API call is still pending), so the value is initially `undefined`. Since `undefined` does not have a `.map()` method, the application crashes. --- ### How to Fix It There are two main ways to fix this: handling it inside the `UserList` component (defensive coding) or fixing the parent component passing…
42.0s1384 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3

This error means `users` is `undefined` when your component tries to render. `users.map(...)` only works if `users` is an array. On the first render, if you haven't passed the prop yet, or your data hasn't loaded from an API yet, `users` is `undefined`, so JavaScript throws: > Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') This almost always happens in one of these 2 cases: 1. You forgot to pass the prop: ```js <UserList /> // users is undefined! ``` vs. ```js <UserList users={myUsers} /> ``` 2. Your data is async and is `undefined` on the first render: ```js const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // undefined at first! // ... <UserList users={users} /> ``` ### How to fix it **1.…
16.7s1242 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 4.7

Here is a review of your function with suggestions for improving readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### Code Review 1. **Import Placement:** You import `requests` and `time` inside the function. Imports should generally be placed at the top of the file so they are loaded once when the module starts, rather than every time the function is called. 2. **Bare `except:`:** You used `except:` without specifying an exception type. This is dangerous because it catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` (Ctrl+C) and `SystemExit`, preventing your program from terminating when needed. You should specifically catch `requests.exception…
24.5s2951 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.3

Here's a friendly review of your `get_data` function — it works, but there are a few readability, robustness, and performance issues worth fixing: ### 1. Readability Issues **a) Imports inside the function** ```python import requests import time ``` This runs on every call (though Python caches it). Move to the top of the file per PEP 8. **b) Poor variable names & magic numbers** `r`, `i`, `data`, `2`, `10`, `200` don't tell the reader much. **c) `== True` anti-pattern** ```python if item["active"] == True: ``` Just use `if item.get("active"):` or `is True`. The current version will also crash with `KeyError` if `active` is missing. **d) No docstring / type hints** No one knows what `ur…
26.9s2141 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 or Muse Spark 1.3?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 4.7 is ¥393.14 and Muse Spark 1.3 is ¥747.65 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 4.7 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 4.7 and Muse Spark 1.3 compare?
GLM 4.7 takes 202,752 tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 takes 1,048,576.
Can I use GLM 4.7 and Muse Spark 1.3 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-4.7" or "muse-spark-1.3" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 4.7 and Muse Spark 1.3 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 4.7

More comparisons with Muse Spark 1.3