Model comparison

GLM 4.7 vs Mercury 2.5

Pricing, context window and real answers (September 2026)

GLM 4.7 (Z.ai) and Mercury 2.5 (Inception), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 4.7Mercury 2.5
ProviderZ.aiInception
Input (per 1M tokens)¥107.22¥6.77
Output (per 1M tokens)¥393.14¥25.38
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥304¥19
Context window202,752 tokens260,000 tokens
Release date12/22/20259/8/2026
Input modalitiestexttext
Arena · overall#81 · ELO 1,442Unranked
Arena · JapaneseUnrankedUnranked
Arena · coding#89 · ELO 1,485Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Mercury 2.5: ¥25.38 per 1M output tokens, 94% less than GLM 4.7.
  • For long documents, Mercury 2.5: a 260,000-token context window against 202,752 for GLM 4.7.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 4.7

There are **3** "r"s in "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step reasoning: 1. **Break down the word into individual letters:** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 2. **Identify the position of each 'r':** * The 3rd letter is **r**. * The 8th letter is **r**. * The 9th letter is **r**. 3. **Count the total occurrences:** 1 + 1 + 1 = 3.
23.3s685 output tokens

Mercury 2.5

To determine the number of 'r's in the word "strawberry", we can examine each letter in sequence: 1. **s** - Not 'r' 2. **t** - Not 'r' 3. **r** - First 'r' found 4. **a** - Not 'r' 5. **w** - Not 'r' 6. **b** - Not 'r' 7. **e** - Not 'r' 8. **r** - Second 'r' found 9. **r** - Third 'r' found 10. **y** - Not 'r' Counting these occurrences, there are **3** 'r's in "strawberry".
1.8s968 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 4.7

### The Cause The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that the variable `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to render. In React, this typically happens for one of two reasons: 1. The **Parent Component** is not passing the `users` prop to `UserList`. 2. The **Parent Component** passed the prop, but the data hasn't loaded yet (e.g., an API call is still pending), so the value is initially `undefined`. Since `undefined` does not have a `.map()` method, the application crashes. --- ### How to Fix It There are two main ways to fix this: handling it inside the `UserList` component (defensive coding) or fixing the parent component passing…
42.0s1384 output tokens

Mercury 2.5

This error occurs because the `users` prop is `undefined` when the component renders. Since the code calls `.map()` on `users`, JavaScript throws a TypeError when `users` is not an array. Here is how to fix it: 1. **Set a Default Value** Update the function signature to default `users` to an empty array if it is not provided: ```javascript function UserList({ users = [] }) { // ... } ``` 2. **Add a Conditional Check** If `users` might be null or undefined during data loading, guard the map operation: ```javascript {users && users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} ``` 3. **Verify Parent Props** Ensure the parent component pas…
2.4s1028 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 4.7

Here is a review of your function with suggestions for improving readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### Code Review 1. **Import Placement:** You import `requests` and `time` inside the function. Imports should generally be placed at the top of the file so they are loaded once when the module starts, rather than every time the function is called. 2. **Bare `except:`:** You used `except:` without specifying an exception type. This is dangerous because it catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` (Ctrl+C) and `SystemExit`, preventing your program from terminating when needed. You should specifically catch `requests.exception…
24.5s2951 output tokens

Mercury 2.5

Here is a review of the function with suggestions for improvement. ### Key Observations 1. **Imports:** Libraries should be imported at the module level, not inside functions. 2. **Exception Handling:** Bare `except:` clauses catch system exits and interrupts. Use specific exceptions like `requests.exceptions.RequestException`. 3. **Logic & Pythonicity:** * Avoid `== True`; rely on truthiness or `item.get("active")`. * List comprehensions are more concise and efficient than manual appending. 4. **Retry Strategy:** Implement exponential backoff instead of fixed sleeps, and avoid sleeping after the final failed attempt. 5. **Documentation:** Add type hints and a docstring fo…
4.6s1999 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 or Mercury 2.5?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 4.7 is ¥393.14 and Mercury 2.5 is ¥25.38 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so Mercury 2.5 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 4.7 and Mercury 2.5 compare?
GLM 4.7 takes 202,752 tokens; Mercury 2.5 takes 260,000.
Can I use GLM 4.7 and Mercury 2.5 with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-4.7" or "mercury-2.5" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 4.7 and Mercury 2.5 from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 4.7

More comparisons with Mercury 2.5