Model comparison

GLM 4.7 vs Inkling

Pricing, context window and real answers (August 2026)

GLM 4.7 (Z.ai) and Inkling (Thinkingmachines), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

z-ai logoGLM 4.7Inkling
ProviderZ.aiThinkingmachines
Input (per 1M tokens)¥107.22¥178.7
Output (per 1M tokens)¥393.14¥723.74
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)¥304¥541
Context window202,752 tokens524,288 tokens
Release date12/22/20257/17/2026
Input modalitiestexttext, image, audio
Arena · overall#79 · ELO 1,442#81 · ELO 1,439
Arena · JapaneseUnranked#52 · ELO 1,425
Arena · coding#87 · ELO 1,485#80 · ELO 1,489

Prices are FastMetal's yen rates before tax. Arena ranks are as of the latest leaderboard scrape.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, GLM 4.7: ¥393.14 per 1M output tokens, 46% less than Inkling.
  • On the Overall arena board, GLM 4.7 ranks higher (#79; Inkling is #81).
  • On the Coding arena board, Inkling ranks higher (#80; GLM 4.7 is #87).
  • For long documents, Inkling: a 524,288-token context window against 202,752 for GLM 4.7.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

GLM 4.7

There are **3** "r"s in "strawberry". Here is the step-by-step reasoning: 1. **Break down the word into individual letters:** s - t - r - a - w - b - e - r - r - y 2. **Identify the position of each 'r':** * The 3rd letter is **r**. * The 8th letter is **r**. * The 9th letter is **r**. 3. **Count the total occurrences:** 1 + 1 + 1 = 3.
23.3s685 output tokens

Inkling

Let's break down the word **"strawberry"** letter by letter: 1. **s** 2. **t** 3. **r** ← (1st 'r') 4. **a** 5. **w** 6. **b** 7. **e** 8. **r** ← (2nd 'r') 9. **r** ← (3rd 'r') 10. **y** So the spelling is: s-t-**r**-a-w-b-e-**r**-**r**-y Counting them up: - One 'r' in "str" (the 3rd letter) - Two 'r's in "berry" (the 8th and 9th letters) **Total: 3 'r's** in "strawberry".**
2.4s417 output tokens

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

GLM 4.7

### The Cause The error `TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map')` means that the variable `users` is `undefined` when the component tries to render. In React, this typically happens for one of two reasons: 1. The **Parent Component** is not passing the `users` prop to `UserList`. 2. The **Parent Component** passed the prop, but the data hasn't loaded yet (e.g., an API call is still pending), so the value is initially `undefined`. Since `undefined` does not have a `.map()` method, the application crashes. --- ### How to Fix It There are two main ways to fix this: handling it inside the `UserList` component (defensive coding) or fixing the parent component passing…
42.0s1384 output tokens

Inkling

The error occurs because `users` is `undefined` when `UserList` renders, so `users.map` fails. This usually happens when: - The parent doesn't pass the prop (`<UserList />` instead of `<UserList users={...} />`) - Data is still loading (e.g., API hasn't returned yet) ## Quick Fix Provide a default empty array so `.map` always has an array to work with: ```jsx function UserList({ users = [] }) { return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>)} </ul> ); } ``` Alternatively, guard against undefined explicitly: ```jsx function UserList({ users }) { if (!users) return null; // or a loading state return ( <ul> {users.map(user => <li key={…
4.9s585 output tokens

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

GLM 4.7

Here is a review of your function with suggestions for improving readability, performance, and best practices, followed by a refactored version of the code. ### Code Review 1. **Import Placement:** You import `requests` and `time` inside the function. Imports should generally be placed at the top of the file so they are loaded once when the module starts, rather than every time the function is called. 2. **Bare `except:`:** You used `except:` without specifying an exception type. This is dangerous because it catches *everything*, including `KeyboardInterrupt` (Ctrl+C) and `SystemExit`, preventing your program from terminating when needed. You should specifically catch `requests.exception…
24.5s2951 output tokens

Inkling

Here is a review with an improved version followed by explanations. ### Issues in the original - **Imports inside the function**: Re-importing on every call is inefficient. - **Bare `except:`**: Catches `SystemExit`, `KeyboardInterrupt`, etc. - **Silent failures**: No logging; errors disappear. - **Magic numbers**: `10`, `2`, `200` are hard-coded. - **Data validation missing**: Assumes `data` is a list and every item has `"active"`, `"name"`, and `"id"` (will crash with `KeyError`). - **Performance**: Uses `.append()` in a loop instead of a list comprehension. - **Ambiguous return**: `[]` means both "success with no results" and "total failure". ### Improved version ```python import loggi…
54.1s5649 output tokens

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 or Inkling?
Per 1M output tokens, GLM 4.7 is ¥393.14 and Inkling is ¥723.74 on FastMetal (yen, before tax), so GLM 4.7 is cheaper.
How do the context windows of GLM 4.7 and Inkling compare?
GLM 4.7 takes 202,752 tokens; Inkling takes 524,288.
Which ranks higher, GLM 4.7 or Inkling?
Inkling ranks higher on the public arena (GLM 4.7 #79, Inkling #52). Ranks move as the leaderboard updates.
Can I use GLM 4.7 and Inkling with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "glm-4.7" or "inkling" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call GLM 4.7 and Inkling from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with GLM 4.7

More comparisons with Inkling