Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.

Specs and pricing

google logoGemini 3.1 Pro Previewmoonshotai logoKimi K3.1 Pro
ProviderGoogleMoonshot
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.11$2.11
Output (per 1M tokens)$12.66$10.55
Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls)$8.44$7.39
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Release date2/19/202610/23/2026
Input modalitiesaudio, file, image, text, videotext, image, video
Throughput (p50)710 tokens/s (n=25)—
Arena · overall#19 · ELO 1,487Unranked
Arena · Japanese#13 · ELO 1,496Unranked
Arena · coding#32 · ELO 1,522Unranked

Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.

Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.

Which should you pick?

  • On price, Kimi K3.1 Pro: $10.55 per 1M output tokens, 17% less than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
  • If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.

Real answers to the same prompts

Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'

Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

There are **3** 'r's in the word 'strawberry'. Here is the step-by-step breakdown of the spelling: 1. **s** - not an 'r' 2. **t** - not an 'r' 3. **r** - **1st 'r'** 4. **a** - not an 'r' 5. **w** - not an 'r' 6. **b** - not an 'r' 7. **e** - not an 'r' 8. **r** - **2nd 'r'** 9. **r** - **3rd 'r'** 10. **y** - not an 'r' Therefore, the total count is 3.
5.3s503 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

There are **3** ‘r’s in **“strawberry.”** 1. Write out each letter: **s – t – r – a – w – b – e – r – r – y** 2. Locate the ‘r’s: positions **3, 8, and 9**. 3. Count them: **1 + 1 + 1 = 3**.
11.3s

Debug This Error

I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

### The Cause This error occurs because the `users` prop being passed to your `UserList` component is currently `undefined`. In JavaScript, you can only use the `.map()` method on arrays. Because `users` is `undefined` (often due to data not finishing an API fetch yet, or the parent component forgetting to pass the prop), Node/React throws an error when it tries to read `.map`. ### How to Fix It You can fix this in a few different ways, depending on how you want your application to behave. #### Fix 1: Assign a Default Value (Recommended) The cleanest way to handle this is to assign a default empty array to `users` in your component's parameters. If `users` is undefined, it defaults to…
13.2s1511 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

## What's causing the error The error means `users` is `undefined` when the component renders, and you can't call `.map()` on `undefined`. The component itself is fine — the problem is that whatever renders `<UserList />` either isn't passing the prop, or is passing a value that isn't an array yet. The most common cause is **async data fetching**: the parent renders `UserList` before the data has loaded. ```jsx function App() { const [users, setUsers] = useState(); // ❌ undefined on first render useEffect(() => { fetch('/api/users') .then(res => res.json()) .then(setUsers); }, []); return <UserList users={users} />; // users is undefined here initially } ``` On…
36.3s

Code Review

Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Here is a review of your function. While the original code works, there are several areas where it can be improved regarding **best practices**, **readability**, and **performance**. ### 1. Refactored Code Here is the improved version of your function. I will explain the specific changes below. ```python import time import requests import logging from typing import Any # Optional: Set up a logger logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) def get_data(url: str, retries: int = 3, delay: int = 2, timeout: int = 10) -> list[dict[str, Any]]: """ Fetches JSON data from a URL and extracts active items. Args: url: The API endpoint to fetch data from. retries: Number o…
23.6s3094 output tokens

Kimi K3.1 Pro

The timeout and bounded retry loop are good starting points. The biggest issue is that failures—and even programming errors—are silently converted into retries and then `[]`. ### Suggested improvements - **Avoid bare `except:`**. It catches `KeyboardInterrupt`, `KeyError`, JSON/schema errors, and other bugs. Retry only expected transient network failures; let malformed responses fail visibly. - **Use a deliberate retry policy**. Retrying `401`, `403`, or `404` usually wastes time. Retry only transient statuses, use exponential backoff, and avoid sleeping after the final attempt. - **Do not use `[]` for both failure and no results**. Prefer raising the final exception so callers can disting…
560.2s

Compare on more prompts →

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Per 1M output tokens, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is $12.66 and Kimi K3.1 Pro is $10.55 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Kimi K3.1 Pro is cheaper.
How do the context windows of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Kimi K3.1 Pro compare?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview takes 1,048,576 tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576.
Can I use Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Kimi K3.1 Pro with the same API key?
Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "gemini-3.1-pro-preview" or "kimi-k3.1-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.

Try both on one API key

Create an account and add credit to call Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Kimi K3.1 Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.

More comparisons with Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

More comparisons with Kimi K3.1 Pro