Fugu Max vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Pricing, context window and real answers (October 2026)
Fugu Max (Sakana AI) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot), compared as you can actually call them on FastMetal. Both are served from the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint and API key; switching is a change to the model string.
Specs and pricing
| Fugu Max | ||
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Sakana AI | Moonshot |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $2.20 | $2.11 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $6.60 | $10.55 |
| Typical cost (1,000 in + 500 out tokens × 1,000 calls) | $5.50 | $7.39 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Release date | 9/11/2026 | 10/23/2026 |
| Input modalities | text, image, file | text, image, video |
| Throughput (p50) | 1307 tokens/s (n=25) | — |
| Arena · overall | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · Japanese | Unranked | Unranked |
| Arena · coding | Unranked | Unranked |
Prices are FastMetal's rates, before tax.
Rankings: LMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset), CC BY 4.0, snapshot 2026-10-22; category names mapped and ratings rounded by FastMetal.
Which should you pick?
- On price, Fugu Max: $6.60 per 1M output tokens, 37% less than Kimi K3.1 Pro.
- For long documents, Kimi K3.1 Pro: a 1,048,576-token context window against 1,000,000 for Fugu Max.
- If in doubt, try both on the same key. Switching is a change to the model string, and each is billed at its own rate.
Real answers to the same prompts
Exactly what the FastMetal gateway returned, side by side. Not benchmark scores: actual output.
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'
Count the number of 'r's in 'strawberry'. Explain your reasoning step by step.
Fugu Max
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Debug This Error
I'm getting the following error in my Node.js application: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'map') at UserList (/app/components/UserList.js:12:25) at renderWithHooks (/app/node_modules/rea…
Fugu Max
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Code Review
Please review the following Python function and suggest improvements for readability, performance, and best practices: def get_data(url, retries=3): import requests import time for i in range(retries):…
Fugu Max
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Frequently asked questions
- Which is cheaper, Fugu Max or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
- Per 1M output tokens, Fugu Max is $6.60 and Kimi K3.1 Pro is $10.55 on FastMetal (US dollars, before tax), so Fugu Max is cheaper.
- How do the context windows of Fugu Max and Kimi K3.1 Pro compare?
- Fugu Max takes 1,000,000 tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro takes 1,048,576.
- Can I use Fugu Max and Kimi K3.1 Pro with the same API key?
- Yes. On FastMetal's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, switch by passing "fugu-max" or "kimi-k3.1-pro" as the model. Each is billed at its own rate from the same prepaid balance.
Try both on one API key
Create an account and add credit to call Fugu Max and Kimi K3.1 Pro from the browser chat and the API. No monthly fee.